XProtect_MACOS_f3edc61

YARA detection rule by Rulezet · GPL-2.0

MACOS.f3edc61

rule XProtect_MACOS_f3edc61 {
  meta:
    description = "MACOS.f3edc61"

  strings:
    $a = "openPhotosNag"
    $b = "silentlyFireUrl"
    $c = "TrackOffers"
    $d = { 48 8D 05 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 8B 8D ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 8B 15 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 8B 35 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 89 D7 48 89 C2 48 89 8D ?? ?? ?? ?? FF 15 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 8B 35 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 8B 8D ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 89 CF 48 89 C2 FF 15 ?? ?? ?? ?? 41 B8 10 00 00 00 31 F6 41 B9 40 00 00 00 44 89 CA 48 89 85 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 8D 85 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 89 C1 48 89 CF 48 89 85 ?? ?? ?? ?? 4C 89 85 ?? ?? ?? ?? E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 8B 85 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 8B 35 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 89 C1 48 89 CF 48 8B 95 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 8D 8D ?? ?? ?? ?? 4C 8B 85 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 89 85 ?? ?? ?? ?? FF 15 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 83 F8 00 48 89 85 ?? ?? ?? ?? 0F 84 ?? ?? ?? ?? }

  condition:
    BINARYALERT_Macho_PRIVATE and filesize < 1000000 and all of them
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

6ade586c-9094-4051-bfb7-52f61e43d34a

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion