_Watcom_CCpp_

YARA detection rule by HydraDragonAntivirus · GPL-2.0

Watcom C/C++

import "pe"
rule _Watcom_CCpp_ {
  meta:
    description = "Watcom C/C++"

  strings:
    $0 = { E9 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? 57 41 }
    $1 = { E9 ?? ?? 00 00 03 10 40 00 57 41 54 43 4F 4D 20 43 2F 43 2B 2B 33 32 20 52 75 6E 2D 54 69 6D 65 20 73 79 73 74 65 6D 2E 20 28 63 29 20 43 6F 70 79 72 69 67 68 74 20 62 79 20 57 41 54 43 4F 4D 20 49 6E 74 65 72 6E 61 74 69 6F 6E 61 6C 20 43 6F 72 70 2E 20 31 39 38 38 2D 31 39 39 35 2E 20 41 6C 6C 20 72 69 67 68 74 73 20 72 65 73 65 72 76 65 64 2E 00 00 00 00 00 00 }
    $2 = { E9 ?? ?? 00 00 03 10 40 00 57 41 54 43 4F 4D 20 43 2F 43 2B 2B 33 32 20 52 75 6E 2D 54 69 6D 65 20 73 79 73 74 65 6D 2E 20 28 63 29 20 43 6F 70 79 72 69 67 68 74 20 62 79 20 57 41 54 43 4F 4D 20 49 6E 74 65 72 6E 61 74 69 6F 6E 61 6C 20 43 6F 72 70 2E 20 }

  condition:
    $0 at pe.entry_point or $1 at pe.entry_point or $2
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

dddff226-bc0b-45f9-8269-0f414ab0b795

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion