EPWIC_15_tap_lo_filterflt64_64_lil_120_

YARA detection rule by HydraDragonAntivirus · GPL-2.0

Rule EPWIC_15_tap_lo_filter__flt64___64_lil_120_ (No description metadata provided).

rule EPWIC_15_tap_lo_filter__flt64___64_lil_120_ {
  strings:
    $a0 = { d6 e1 b6 a7 7c 70 54 bf 2e 2f a0 9e 95 70 64 bf a8 86 c8 ac 88 e1 81 3f 01 a9 9e e3 db 6f 94 3f 79 c9 ff e4 ef de a9 bf fd ac a6 a9 6d dc be bf 2c 97 95 3f 42 c1 d2 3f 90 46 0d bf fe 98 e6 3f 2c 97 95 3f 42 c1 d2 3f fd ac a6 a9 6d dc be bf 79 c9 ff e4 ef de a9 bf 01 a9 9e e3 db 6f 94 3f a8 86 c8 ac 88 e1 81 3f 2e 2f a0 9e 95 70 64 bf d6 e1 b6 a7 7c 70 54 bf }

  condition:
    $a0
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

9da0dfd9-f9a6-4a59-b5f2-78ef95b2fa2a

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion