DFC_values__32_big_AND_

YARA detection rule by HydraDragonAntivirus · GPL-2.0

Rule DFC_values__32_big_AND_ (No description metadata provided).

rule DFC_values__32_big_AND_ {
  strings:
    $a0 = { eb 64 74 9a [0-20] 86 d1 bf 27 [0-20] 5b 9b 24 1d [0-20] b7 e1 51 62 [0-20] 8a ed 2a 6a [0-20] bf 71 58 80 [0-20] 9c f4 f3 c7 [0-20] 62 e7 16 0f [0-20] 38 b4 da 56 [0-20] a7 84 d9 04 [0-20] 51 90 cf ef [0-20] 32 4e 77 38 [0-20] 92 6c fb e5 [0-20] f4 bf 8d 8d [0-20] 8c 31 d7 63 [0-20] da 06 c8 0a [0-20] bb 11 85 eb [0-20] 4f 7c 7b 57 [0-20] 57 f5 95 84 [0-20] 90 cf d4 7d [0-20] 7c 19 bb 42 [0-20] 15 8d 95 54 [0-20] f7 b4 6b ce }

  condition:
    $a0
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

e1d42495-c6df-4d82-b82d-fcf1027aa33a

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion