_RLPack_120_Basic_Edition_aPLib_

YARA detection rule by HydraDragonAntivirus · GPL-2.0

RLPack 1.20 Basic Edition [aPLib

import "pe"
rule _RLPack_120_Basic_Edition_aPLib_
{
	meta:
		description = "RLPack 1.20 Basic Edition [aPLib"
	strings:
		$0 = {60 E8 00 00 00 00 8B 2C 24 83 C4 04 83 7C 24 28 01 75 0C 8B 44 24 24 89 85 92 05 00 00 EB 0C 8B 85 8E 05 00 00 89 85 92 05 00 00 8D B5 BA 05 00 00 8D 9D 41 04 00 00 33 FF E8 38 01 00 00 EB 1B 8B 85 92 05 00 00 FF 74 37 04 01 04 24 FF 34 37 01 04 24 FF D3}
		$1 = {60 E8 00 00 00 00 8B 2C 24 83 C4 04 83 7C 24 28 01 75 0C 8B 44 24 24 89 85 92 05 00 00 EB 0C 8B 85 8E 05 00 00 89 85 92 05 00 00 8D B5 BA 05 00 00 8D 9D 41 04 00 00 33 FF E8 38 01 00 00 EB 1B 8B 85 92 05 00 00 FF 74 37 04 01 04 24 FF 34 37 01 04 24 FF D3 83 C4 08 83 C7 08 83 3C 37 00 75 DF 83 BD 9E 05 00 00 00 74 0E 83 BD A2 05 00 00 00 74 05 E8 D6 01 00 00}
	condition:
		$0 at pe.entry_point or $1 at pe.entry_point
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

adf4c9fc-63bb-485c-871c-892ff78873ff

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion