_EncryptPE_V22007121__WFS_

YARA detection rule by HydraDragonAntivirus · GPL-2.0

EncryptPE V2.2007.12.1 -> WFS

import "pe"
rule _EncryptPE_V22007121__WFS_
{
	meta:
		description = "EncryptPE V2.2007.12.1 -> WFS"
	strings:
		$0 = {00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 45 50 45 3A 20 45 6E 63 72 79 70 74 50 45 20 56 32 2E 32 30 30 37 2E 31 32 2E 31 2C 20 43 6F 70 79 72 69 67 68 74 20 28 43 29 20 57 46 53 00 00 48 6F 6D 65 50 61 67 65 3A 20 77 77 77 2E 65 6E 63 72 79 70 74}
		$1 = {00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 45 50 45 3A 20 45 6E 63 72 79 70 74 50 45 20 56 32 2E 32 30 30 37 2E 31 32 2E 31 2C 20 43 6F 70 79 72 69 67 68 74 20 28 43 29 20 57 46 53 00 00 48 6F 6D 65 50 61 67 65 3A 20 77 77 77 2E 65 6E 63 72 79 70 74 70 65 2E 63 6F 6D 00 00 00 00 00 45 4D 61 69 6C 3A 20 77 66 73 23 65 6E 63 72 79 70 74 70 65 2E 63 6F 6D 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00}
	condition:
		$0 at pe.entry_point or $1
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

15c2e0d9-78c5-4e33-97c4-3ca38ec15d07

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion