_Obsidium_1331__Obsidium_Software_

YARA detection rule by HydraDragonAntivirus · GPL-2.0

Obsidium 1.3.3.1 -> Obsidium Software

import "pe"
rule _Obsidium_1331__Obsidium_Software_
{
	meta:
		description = "Obsidium 1.3.3.1 -> Obsidium Software"
	strings:
		$0 = {EB 01 ?? E8 29 00 00 00 EB 02 ?? ?? EB 03 ?? ?? ?? 8B 54 24 0C EB 02 ?? ?? 83 82 B8 00 00 00 24 EB 04 ?? ?? ?? ?? 33 C0 EB 02 ?? ?? C3 EB 02 ?? ?? EB 02 ?? ?? 64 67 FF 36 00 00 EB 04 ?? ?? ?? ?? 64 67 89 26 00 00 EB 01 ?? EB 02 ?? ?? 50 EB 01 ?? 33 C0 EB 04 ?? ?? ?? ?? 8B 00 EB 03 ?? ?? ?? C3 EB 03 ?? ?? ?? E9 FA 00 00 00 EB 02 ?? ?? E8 D5 FF FF FF EB 01 ?? EB 04 ?? ?? ?? ?? 58 EB 02 ?? ?? EB 04 ?? ?? ?? ?? 64 67 8F 06 00 00 EB 01 ?? 83 C4 04 EB 02 ?? ?? E8 5F 27 00 00}
	condition:
		$0 at pe.entry_point
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

0d044fb5-1a27-403f-bc73-f0ebce1be068

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion