_UPX_v20__Markus_Laszlo__Reiser_h_

YARA detection rule by HydraDragonAntivirus · GPL-2.0

UPX v2.0 -> Markus, Laszlo & Reiser (h)

rule _UPX_v20__Markus_Laszlo__Reiser_h_
{
	meta:
		description = "UPX v2.0 -> Markus, Laszlo & Reiser (h)"
	strings:
		$0 = {55 FF 96 ?? ?? ?? ?? 09 C0 74 07 89 03 83 C3 04 EB ?? FF 96 ?? ?? ?? ?? 8B AE ?? ?? ?? ?? 8D BE 00 F0 FF FF BB 00 10 00 00 50 54 6A 04 53 57 FF D5 8D 87 ?? ?? 00 00 80 20 7F 80 60 28 7F 58 50 54 50 53 57 FF D5 58 61 8D 44 24 80 6A 00 39 C4 75 FA 83 EC 80}
		$1 = {55 FF 96 ?? ?? ?? ?? 09 C0 74 07 89 03 83 C3 04 EB ?? FF 96 ?? ?? ?? ?? 8B AE ?? ?? ?? ?? 8D BE 00 F0 FF FF BB 00 10 00 00 50 54 6A 04 53 57 FF D5 8D 87 ?? ?? 00 00 80 20 7F 80 60 28 7F 58 50 54 50 53 57 FF D5 58 61 8D 44 24 80 6A 00 39 C4 75 FA 83 EC 80 E9}
	condition:
		$0 or $1
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

118f2875-a56e-4952-99b6-77b3ee747039

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion