_UPX_290_LZMA__Markus_Oberhumer_Laszlo_Molnar__John_Reiser_

YARA detection rule by HydraDragonAntivirus · GPL-2.0

UPX 2.90 [LZMA] -> Markus Oberhumer, Laszlo Molnar & John Reiser

import "pe"
rule _UPX_290_LZMA__Markus_Oberhumer_Laszlo_Molnar__John_Reiser_
{
	meta:
		description = "UPX 2.90 [LZMA] -> Markus Oberhumer, Laszlo Molnar & John Reiser"
	strings:
		$0 = {60 BE ?? ?? ?? ?? 8D BE ?? ?? ?? ?? 57 83 CD FF 89 E5 8D 9C 24 ?? ?? ?? ?? 31 C0 50 39 DC 75 FB 46 46 53 68 ?? ?? ?? ?? 57 83 C3 04 53 68 ?? ?? ?? ?? 56 83 C3 04 53 50 C7 03 ?? ?? ?? ?? 90 90}
		$1 = {60 BE ?? ?? ?? ?? 8D BE ?? ?? ?? ?? 57 83 CD FF EB 10 90 90 90 90 90 90 8A 06 46 88 07 47 01 DB 75 07 8B 1E 83 EE FC 11 DB 72 ED B8 01 00 00 00 01 DB 75 07 8B 1E 83 EE FC 11 DB 11 C0 01 DB}
	condition:
		$0 at pe.entry_point or $1 at pe.entry_point
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

f4f71dd8-715c-49ec-96d9-047534a0ff64

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion