PEiD_01981_RLPack_1_18__aPlib_0_43_____ap0x_

YARA detection rule by HydraDragonAntivirus · GPL-2.0

[RLPack 1.18 (aPlib 0.43) -> ap0x]

rule PEiD_01981_RLPack_1_18__aPlib_0_43_____ap0x_ {
  meta:
    description = "[RLPack 1.18 (aPlib 0.43) -> ap0x]"
    ep_only     = "true"

  strings:
    $a = { 60 E8 00 00 00 00 8B 2C 24 83 C4 ?? 8D B5 1A 04 00 00 8D 9D C1 02 00 00 33 FF E8 61 01 00 00 EB 0F FF 74 37 04 FF 34 37 FF D3 83 C4 ?? 83 C7 ?? 83 3C 37 00 75 EB 83 BD 06 04 00 00 00 74 0E 83 BD 0A 04 00 00 00 74 05 E8 D7 01 00 00 8D 74 37 04 53 6A ?? 68 ?? ?? ?? ?? 68 ?? ?? ?? ?? 6A 00 FF 95 A7 03 00 00 89 85 16 04 00 00 5B FF B5 16 04 00 00 56 FF D3 83 C4 ?? 8B B5 16 04 00 00 8B C6 EB 01 }

  condition:
    $a
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

6418d907-b5d6-4304-94b1-14bd202b947e

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion