PEiD_01209_MSLRH_0_32a__fake_UPX_0_89_6___1_02___1_05___1_24_____emadicius_

YARA detection rule by HydraDragonAntivirus · GPL-2.0

[MSLRH 0.32a (fake UPX 0.89.6 - 1.02 / 1.05 - 1.24) -> emadicius]

rule PEiD_01209_MSLRH_0_32a__fake_UPX_0_89_6___1_02___1_05___1_24_____emadicius_ {
  meta:
    description = "[MSLRH 0.32a (fake UPX 0.89.6 - 1.02 / 1.05 - 1.24) -> emadicius]"
    ep_only     = "false"

  strings:
    $a = { 60 BE 00 90 8B 00 8D BE 00 80 B4 FF 57 83 CD FF EB 3A 90 90 90 90 90 90 8A 06 46 88 07 47 01 DB 75 07 8B 1E 83 EE FC 11 DB 72 ED B8 01 00 00 00 01 DB 75 07 8B 1E 83 EE FC 11 DB 11 C0 01 DB 73 0B 75 19 8B 1E 83 EE FC 11 DB 72 10 58 61 90 EB 05 E8 EB 04 40 }

  condition:
    $a
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

068d4785-7cd7-46ff-b2a4-0777f7d79b70

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion