PEiD_00450_D1S1G_v1_1_Beta____Scrambled_EXE____D1N_

YARA detection rule by HydraDragonAntivirus · GPL-2.0

[D1S1G v1.1 Beta ++ Scrambled EXE -> D1N]

rule PEiD_00450_D1S1G_v1_1_Beta____Scrambled_EXE____D1N_ {
  meta:
    description = "[D1S1G v1.1 Beta ++ Scrambled EXE -> D1N]"
    ep_only     = "false"

  strings:
    $a = { E8 07 00 00 00 E8 1E 00 00 00 C3 90 58 89 C2 89 C2 25 00 F0 FF FF 50 83 C0 55 8D 00 FF 30 8D 40 04 FF 30 52 C3 8D 40 00 55 8B EC 83 C4 E8 53 56 57 8B 4D 10 8B 45 08 89 45 F8 8B 45 0C 89 45 F4 8D 41 61 8B 38 8D 41 65 8B 00 03 C7 89 45 FC 8D 41 69 8B 00 03 C7 8D 51 6D 8B 12 03 D7 83 C1 71 8B 09 03 CF 2B CA 72 0A 41 87 D1 80 31 FF 41 4A 75 F9 89 45 F0 EB 71 8B }

  condition:
    $a
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

84994537-6a5d-428a-af02-8f13688f1312

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion