PEiD_00029_ACProtect_1_4x____RISCO_soft_

YARA detection rule by HydraDragonAntivirus · GPL-2.0

[ACProtect 1.4x -> RISCO soft]

rule PEiD_00029_ACProtect_1_4x____RISCO_soft_ {
  meta:
    description = "[ACProtect 1.4x -> RISCO soft]"
    ep_only     = "false"

  strings:
    $a = { 47 65 74 50 72 6F 63 41 64 64 72 65 73 73 00 00 00 47 65 74 4D 6F 64 75 6C 65 48 61 6E 64 6C 65 41 00 00 00 4C 6F 61 64 4C 69 62 72 61 72 79 41 00 00 00 45 78 69 74 50 72 6F 63 65 73 73 00 00 00 4D 65 73 73 61 67 65 42 6F 78 41 00 90 4D 69 6E 65 49 6D 70 }

  condition:
    $a
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

5356d1a3-6dcf-46cb-8470-659a2e886ace

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion