RBAC Permission Enumeration Attempt

SIGMA detection rule by Leo Tsaousis (@laripping) · NOASSERTION

Detects identities attempting to enumerate their Kubernetes RBAC permissions. In the early stages of a breach, attackers will aim to list the permissions they have within the compromised environment. In a Kubernetes cluster, this can be achieved by interacting with the API server, and querying the SelfSubjectAccessReview API via e.g. a "kubectl auth can-i --list" command. This will enumerate the Role-Based Access Controls (RBAC) rules defining the compromised user's authorization.

title: RBAC Permission Enumeration Attempt
id: 84b777bd-c946-4d17-aa2e-c39f5a454325
status: test
description: |
    Detects identities attempting to enumerate their Kubernetes RBAC permissions.
    In the early stages of a breach, attackers will aim to list the permissions they have within the compromised environment.
    In a Kubernetes cluster, this can be achieved by interacting with the API server, and querying the SelfSubjectAccessReview API via e.g. a "kubectl auth can-i --list" command.
    This will enumerate the Role-Based Access Controls (RBAC) rules defining the compromised user's authorization.
references:
    - https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/security/current/kubernetes-suspicious-self-subject-review.html
author: Leo Tsaousis (@laripping)
date: 2024-03-26
tags:
    - attack.t1069.003
    - attack.t1087.004
    - attack.discovery
logsource:
    category: application
    product: kubernetes
    service: audit
detection:
    selection:
        verb: 'create'
        apiGroup: 'authorization.k8s.io'
        objectRef.resource: 'selfsubjectrulesreviews'
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Unknown
level: low

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

a4a3df3c-0c8e-4d15-84a8-dca0186758a1

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion