Suspicious DNS Z Flag Bit Set

SIGMA detection rule by @neu5ron, SOC Prime Team, Corelight · NOASSERTION

The DNS Z flag is bit within the DNS protocol header that is, per the IETF design, meant to be used reserved (unused). Although recently it has been used in DNSSec, the value being set to anything other than 0 should be rare. Otherwise if it is set to non 0 and DNSSec is being used, then excluding the legitimate domains is low effort and high reward. Determine if multiple of these files were accessed in a short period of time to further enhance the possibility of seeing if this was a one off or the possibility of larger sensitive file gathering. This Sigma query is designed to accompany the Corelight Threat Hunting Guide, which can be found here: https://www3.corelight.com/corelights-introductory-guide-to-threat-hunting-with-zeek-bro-logs'

title: Suspicious DNS Z Flag Bit Set
id: ede05abc-2c9e-4624-9944-9ff17fdc0bf5
status: test
description: |
    The DNS Z flag is bit within the DNS protocol header that is, per the IETF design, meant to be used reserved (unused).
    Although recently it has been used in DNSSec, the value being set to anything other than 0 should be rare.
    Otherwise if it is set to non 0 and DNSSec is being used, then excluding the legitimate domains is low effort and high reward.
    Determine if multiple of these files were accessed in a short period of time to further enhance the possibility of seeing if this was a one off or the possibility of larger sensitive file gathering.
    This Sigma query is designed to accompany the Corelight Threat Hunting Guide, which can be found here: https://www3.corelight.com/corelights-introductory-guide-to-threat-hunting-with-zeek-bro-logs'
references:
    - https://twitter.com/neu5ron/status/1346245602502443009
    - https://tdm.socprime.com/tdm/info/eLbyj4JjI15v#sigma
    - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2929#section-2.1
    - https://www.netresec.com/?page=Blog&month=2021-01&post=Finding-Targeted-SUNBURST-Victims-with-pDNS
author: '@neu5ron, SOC Prime Team, Corelight'
date: 2021-05-04
modified: 2022-11-29
tags:
    - attack.t1095
    - attack.t1571
    - attack.command-and-control
logsource:
    product: zeek
    service: dns
detection:
    z_flag_unset:
        Z: 0
    most_probable_valid_domain:
        query|contains: '.'
    exclude_tlds:
        query|endswith:
            - '.arpa'
            - '.local'
            - '.ultradns.net'
            - '.twtrdns.net'
            - '.azuredns-prd.info'
            - '.azure-dns.com'
            - '.azuredns-ff.info'
            - '.azuredns-ff.org'
            - '.azuregov-dns.org'
    exclude_query_types:
        qtype_name:
            - 'ns'
            - 'mx'
    exclude_responses:
        answers|endswith: '\\x00'
    exclude_netbios:
        id.resp_p:
            - 137
            - 138
            - 139
    condition: not z_flag_unset and most_probable_valid_domain and not (exclude_tlds or exclude_query_types or exclude_responses or exclude_netbios)
falsepositives:
    - 'Internal or legitimate external domains using DNSSec. Verify if these are legitimate DNSSec domains and then exclude them.'
    - 'If you work in a Public Sector then it may be good to exclude things like endswith ".edu", ".gov" and or ".mil"'
level: medium

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

1954a024-c951-4f0f-85c5-d9a4c7857fa3

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion