Macro Enabled In A Potentially Suspicious Document

SIGMA detection rule by Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) · NOASSERTION

Detects registry changes to Office trust records where the path is located in a potentially suspicious location

title: Macro Enabled In A Potentially Suspicious Document
id: a166f74e-bf44-409d-b9ba-ea4b2dd8b3cd
related:
    - id: 295a59c1-7b79-4b47-a930-df12c15fc9c2
      type: derived
status: test
description: Detects registry changes to Office trust records where the path is located in a potentially suspicious location
references:
    - https://twitter.com/inversecos/status/1494174785621819397
    - Internal Research
author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems)
date: 2023-06-21
modified: 2023-08-17
tags:
    - attack.persistence
    - attack.defense-impairment
    - attack.t1112
logsource:
    category: registry_set
    product: windows
detection:
    selection_value:
        TargetObject|contains: '\Security\Trusted Documents\TrustRecords'
    selection_paths:
        TargetObject|contains:
            # Note: add more locations where you don't expect a user to executed macro enabled docs
            - '/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/'
            - '/AppData/Local/Temp/'
            - '/PerfLogs/'
            - 'C:/Users/Public/'
            - 'file:///D:/'
            - 'file:///E:/'
    condition: all of selection_*
falsepositives:
    - Unlikely
level: high

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

50b0f3df-7607-41db-b943-e123247572ab

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion