MMC Loading Script Engines DLLs

SIGMA detection rule by Swachchhanda Shrawan Poudel (Nextron Systems) · NOASSERTION

Detects when the Microsoft Management Console (MMC) loads the DLL libraries like vbscript, jscript etc which might indicate an attempt to execute malicious scripts within a trusted system process for bypassing application whitelisting or defense evasion.

title: MMC Loading Script Engines DLLs
id: a9c73e8b-3b2d-4c45-8ef2-5f9a9c9998ad
status: experimental
description: |
    Detects when the Microsoft Management Console (MMC) loads the DLL libraries like vbscript, jscript etc which might indicate an attempt
    to execute malicious scripts within a trusted system process for bypassing application whitelisting or defense evasion.
references:
    - https://tria.ge/241015-l98snsyeje/behavioral2
    - https://www.elastic.co/security-labs/grimresource
author: Swachchhanda Shrawan Poudel (Nextron Systems)
date: 2025-02-05
tags:
    - attack.execution
    - attack.stealth
    - attack.t1059.005
    - attack.t1218.014
logsource:
    category: image_load
    product: windows
detection:
    selection:
        Image|endswith: '\mmc.exe'
        ImageLoaded|endswith:
            - '\vbscript.dll'
            - '\jscript.dll'
            - '\jscript9.dll'
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Legitimate MMC operations or extensions loading these libraries
level: medium

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

c407c51a-f8f5-4a87-a9bd-cf43c9f848b0

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion