Suspicious Mstsc.EXE Execution With Local RDP File

SIGMA detection rule by Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) · NOASSERTION

Detects potential RDP connection via Mstsc using a local ".rdp" file located in suspicious locations.

title: Suspicious Mstsc.EXE Execution With Local RDP File
id: 6e22722b-dfb1-4508-a911-49ac840b40f8
status: test
description: Detects potential RDP connection via Mstsc using a local ".rdp" file located in suspicious locations.
references:
    - https://www.blackhillsinfosec.com/rogue-rdp-revisiting-initial-access-methods/
    - https://web.archive.org/web/20230726144748/https://blog.thickmints.dev/mintsights/detecting-rogue-rdp/
author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems)
date: 2023-04-18
tags:
    - attack.command-and-control
    - attack.t1219.002
logsource:
    category: process_creation
    product: windows
detection:
    selection_img:
        - Image|endswith: '\mstsc.exe'
        - OriginalFileName: 'mstsc.exe'
    selection_extension:
        CommandLine|endswith:
            - '.rdp'
            - '.rdp"'
    selection_paths:
        # Note: This list of paths is better transformed into a whitelist where you only exclude legitimate locations you use in your env
        CommandLine|contains:
            - ':\Users\Public\'
            - ':\Windows\System32\spool\drivers\color'
            - ':\Windows\System32\Tasks_Migrated '
            - ':\Windows\Tasks\'
            - ':\Windows\Temp\'
            - ':\Windows\Tracing\'
            - '\AppData\Local\Temp\'
            # - '\Desktop\' # Could be source of FP depending on the environment
            - '\Downloads\' # Could be source of FP depending on the environment
    condition: all of selection_*
falsepositives:
    - Likelihood is related to how often the paths are used in the environment
level: high

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

025bc524-6472-4eba-9517-7a58ce058d3b

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion