PetitPotam Suspicious Kerberos TGT Request

SIGMA detection rule by Mauricio Velazco, Michael Haag · NOASSERTION

Detect suspicious Kerberos TGT requests. Once an attacer obtains a computer certificate by abusing Active Directory Certificate Services in combination with PetitPotam, the next step would be to leverage the certificate for malicious purposes. One way of doing this is to request a Kerberos Ticket Granting Ticket using a tool like Rubeus. This request will generate a 4768 event with some unusual fields depending on the environment. This analytic will require tuning, we recommend filtering Account_Name to the Domain Controller computer accounts.

title: PetitPotam Suspicious Kerberos TGT Request
id: 6a53d871-682d-40b6-83e0-b7c1a6c4e3a5
status: test
description: |
    Detect suspicious Kerberos TGT requests.
    Once an attacer obtains a computer certificate by abusing Active Directory Certificate Services in combination with PetitPotam, the next step would be to leverage the certificate for malicious purposes.
    One way of doing this is to request a Kerberos Ticket Granting Ticket using a tool like Rubeus.
    This request will generate a 4768 event with some unusual fields depending on the environment.
    This analytic will require tuning, we recommend filtering Account_Name to the Domain Controller computer accounts.
references:
    - https://github.com/topotam/PetitPotam
    - https://isc.sans.edu/forums/diary/Active+Directory+Certificate+Services+ADCS+PKI+domain+admin+vulnerability/27668/
    - https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/88d689fe8a055d8284337b9fad5d9152b42043db/detections/endpoint/petitpotam_suspicious_kerberos_tgt_request.yml
author: Mauricio Velazco, Michael Haag
date: 2021-09-02
modified: 2022-10-05
tags:
    - attack.credential-access
    - attack.t1187
logsource:
    product: windows
    service: security
    definition: 'The advanced audit policy setting "Account Logon > Kerberos Authentication Service" must be configured for Success/Failure'
detection:
    selection:
        EventID: 4768
        TargetUserName|endswith: '$'
        CertThumbprint|contains: '*'
    filter_local:
        IpAddress: '::1'
    filter_thumbprint:
        CertThumbprint: ''
    condition: selection and not 1 of filter_*
falsepositives:
    - False positives are possible if the environment is using certificates for authentication. We recommend filtering Account_Name to the Domain Controller computer accounts.
level: high

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

76ad1bf9-e14f-4f3c-83ad-6969203984cf

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion