PWS_O97M_Rofpor_A

YARA detection rule by roadwy

PWS:O97M/Rofpor.A,SIGNATURE_TYPE_MACROHSTR_EXT,02 00 02 00 02 00 00

rule PWS_O97M_Rofpor_A{
	meta:
		description = "PWS:O97M/Rofpor.A,SIGNATURE_TYPE_MACROHSTR_EXT,02 00 02 00 02 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {64 6d 66 6f 72 65 76 65 72 2e 62 69 7a 2f 72 65 70 6f 72 74 65 72 2e 70 68 70 3f 6d 73 67 3d 22 20 26 20 6d 65 73 73 61 67 65 5f 6e 6f 5f 73 70 61 63 65 73 20 26 20 22 26 75 6e 61 6d 65 3d 22 20 26 20 75 73 65 72 6e 61 6d 65 5f 6e 6f 5f 73 70 61 63 65 73 20 26 20 22 26 70 77 6f 72 64 3d } 		$a_01_1 = {43 61 6c 6c 20 75 70 6c 6f 61 64 50 4f 53 54 28 22 4e 55 4c 4c 22 2c 20 22 4e 55 4c 4c 22 2c 20 22 4d 41 43 52 4f 5f 45 58 45 43 55 54 45 44 5f 57 4f 52 44 5f 50 5f 4f 4e 4c 59 22 29 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1) >=2
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

7ab8c1d2-f6df-43b5-9013-ec334ccaac18

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion