Exploit_Win32_Crpexp_gen_A

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Exploit:Win32/Crpexp.gen!A,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,0a 00 01 00 06 00 00

rule Exploit_Win32_Crpexp_gen_A{
	meta:
		description = "Exploit:Win32/Crpexp.gen!A,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,0a 00 01 00 06 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_07_0 = {5b 81 73 13 ?? ?? ?? ?? 83 eb fc e2 f4 } 		$a_07_1 = {5e 81 76 0e ?? ?? ?? ?? 83 ee fc e2 f4 } 		$a_07_2 = {33 c9 66 b9 ?? ?? 80 34 ?? ?? e2 fa } 		$a_07_3 = {31 c9 81 e9 fe fe ff ff ac 34 ?? aa e2 fa } 		$a_07_4 = {33 c9 66 b9 ?? ?? 80 33 ?? 43 e2 fa } 		$a_07_5 = {33 c9 66 b9 ?? ?? 80 34 0b ?? e2 fa } 	condition:
		((#a_07_0  & 1)*1+(#a_07_1  & 1)*1+(#a_07_2  & 1)*1+(#a_07_3  & 1)*1+(#a_07_4  & 1)*1+(#a_07_5  & 1)*1) >=1
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

5cb83079-0744-469e-84eb-05a637085d9e

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion