Exploit_iPhoneOS_Kappotoma_B

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Exploit:iPhoneOS/Kappotoma.B,SIGNATURE_TYPE_MACHOHSTR_EXT,02 00 02 00 05 00 00

rule Exploit_iPhoneOS_Kappotoma_B{
	meta:
		description = "Exploit:iPhoneOS/Kappotoma.B,SIGNATURE_TYPE_MACHOHSTR_EXT,02 00 02 00 05 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_00_0 = {39 50 42 45 32 56 35 36 36 58 2e 63 6f 6d 2e 72 72 65 6d 61 6e 31 36 38 2e 63 6e } 		$a_00_1 = {6b 70 6f 72 74 2e 69 70 5f 6b 6f 62 6a 65 63 74 3d 25 70 } 		$a_00_2 = {45 72 72 6f 72 3a 20 65 78 70 6c 6f 69 74 2e 20 52 65 62 6f 6f 74 20 61 6e 64 20 72 65 74 72 79 2e } 		$a_00_3 = {6a 61 69 6c 62 72 65 61 6b 33 36 35 20 61 6e 64 20 43 6f 72 79 4b 6f 72 6e 6f 77 69 63 7a } 		$a_00_4 = {45 78 70 6c 6f 69 74 20 73 65 6c 65 63 74 65 64 3a 20 76 33 6e 74 65 78 } 	condition:
		((#a_00_0  & 1)*1+(#a_00_1  & 1)*1+(#a_00_2  & 1)*1+(#a_00_3  & 1)*1+(#a_00_4  & 1)*1) >=2
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

1a2942ba-32af-4576-997f-22f366e3673c

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion