Exploit_Linux_Apache_A_xp

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Exploit:Linux/Apache.A!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 04 00 00

rule Exploit_Linux_Apache_A_xp{
	meta:
		description = "Exploit:Linux/Apache.A!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 04 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {2e 2f 61 70 61 63 68 65 5f 6f 70 65 6e 73 73 6c 5f 65 78 70 6c 6f 69 74 } 		$a_01_1 = {61 70 61 63 68 65 20 75 69 64 } 		$a_01_2 = {2e 2f 61 70 61 63 68 65 5f 73 63 6f 72 65 62 6f 61 72 64 5f 65 78 70 6c 6f 69 74 20 70 69 64 } 		$a_01_3 = {70 72 6f 63 65 73 73 20 31 32 30 39 37 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1+(#a_01_3  & 1)*1) >=4
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

c5553ded-d2ac-4c4d-aceb-4ff28058fff2

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion