Exploit_Linux_DLink_A_xp

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Exploit:Linux/DLink.A!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 04 00 00

rule Exploit_Linux_DLink_A_xp{
	meta:
		description = "Exploit:Linux/DLink.A!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 04 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {50 4f 53 54 20 2f 47 70 6f 6e 46 6f 72 6d 2f 64 69 61 67 5f 46 6f 72 6d } 		$a_03_1 = {77 67 65 74 20 68 74 74 70 3a 2f 2f [0-20] 2f 72 76 73 2e 73 68 } 		$a_03_2 = {62 75 73 79 62 6f 78 2b 77 67 65 74 2b 68 74 74 70 3a 2f 2f [0-20] 71 74 78 2e 6d 69 70 73 2b 2d 4f 2b 2f 74 6d 70 2f 66 66 } 		$a_01_3 = {47 45 54 20 2f 62 6f 61 72 64 2e 63 67 69 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_03_1  & 1)*1+(#a_03_2  & 1)*1+(#a_01_3  & 1)*1) >=3
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

ac889b97-4dc0-4578-a44d-9390367f767d

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion