Exploit_Linux_Lotoor_C_xp

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Exploit:Linux/Lotoor.C!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 04 00 00

rule Exploit_Linux_Lotoor_C_xp{
	meta:
		description = "Exploit:Linux/Lotoor.C!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 04 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {73 64 40 66 75 63 6b 73 68 65 65 70 2e 6f 72 67 } 		$a_01_1 = {5b 30 6d 20 79 33 72 20 34 32 32 20 31 32 20 6e 30 37 20 33 72 33 33 37 20 33 6e 75 50 68 } 		$a_01_2 = {5b 30 6d 20 54 72 79 20 69 6e 63 72 65 61 73 65 20 6e 72 70 61 67 65 73 } 		$a_01_3 = {5b 30 6d 20 6a 30 30 20 31 75 28 6b 37 20 6b 31 64 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1+(#a_01_3  & 1)*1) >=3
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

9333de7f-e68f-4452-9333-970e4acbc9da

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion