Exploit_Linux_Lightaidra_A_MTB

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Exploit:Linux/Lightaidra.A!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 04 00 00

rule Exploit_Linux_Lightaidra_A_MTB{
	meta:
		description = "Exploit:Linux/Lightaidra.A!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 04 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_00_0 = {70 72 65 70 61 72 69 6e 67 20 70 61 79 6c 6f 61 64 20 62 75 66 66 65 72 } 		$a_00_1 = {63 6c 65 61 72 69 6e 67 20 62 79 74 65 20 61 74 20 30 78 25 6c 78 } 		$a_00_2 = {67 6f 74 20 72 6f 6f 74 2c 20 65 6e 6a 6f 79 } 		$a_00_3 = {77 61 6b 69 6e 67 20 75 70 20 70 61 72 65 6e 74 } 	condition:
		((#a_00_0  & 1)*1+(#a_00_1  & 1)*1+(#a_00_2  & 1)*1+(#a_00_3  & 1)*1) >=4
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

f10e681f-1176-4363-8cfa-dc19fe42c9bc

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion