Misleading_Linux_Chisel_B_MTB

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Misleading:Linux/Chisel.B!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 04 00 00

rule Misleading_Linux_Chisel_B_MTB{
	meta:
		description = "Misleading:Linux/Chisel.B!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 04 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {4c 65 74 73 45 6e 63 72 79 70 74 2e 66 75 6e 63 31 } 		$a_01_1 = {4e 65 77 43 42 43 45 6e 63 72 79 70 74 65 72 } 		$a_01_2 = {63 68 69 73 65 6c 2f 73 65 72 76 65 72 2e 4e 65 77 53 65 72 76 65 72 } 		$a_00_3 = {6d 61 6e 2d 69 6e 2d 74 68 65 2d 6d 69 64 64 6c 65 20 61 74 74 61 63 6b 73 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*2+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1+(#a_00_3  & 1)*1) >=4
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

814f382c-1443-4633-9ddf-f8a8248a7dfb

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion