Backdoor_Win32_Hupigon_ZAF

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Backdoor:Win32/Hupigon.ZAF,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,0a 00 0a 00 09 00 00

rule Backdoor_Win32_Hupigon_ZAF{
	meta:
		description = "Backdoor:Win32/Hupigon.ZAF,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,0a 00 0a 00 09 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {42 6f 72 6c 61 6e 64 5c 44 65 6c 70 68 69 5c 52 54 4c } 		$a_00_1 = {00 77 69 6e 64 6e 73 2e 69 6e 69 00 } 		$a_00_2 = {00 62 65 69 7a 68 75 00 } 		$a_00_3 = {00 67 6f 6f 67 6c 65 63 65 2e 65 78 65 00 } 		$a_00_4 = {00 4c 49 54 41 4f 2e 69 6e 69 00 } 		$a_00_5 = {00 59 65 73 6e 6f 73 65 72 76 65 72 00 } 		$a_00_6 = {00 2e 33 33 32 32 2e 6f 72 67 3a 00 } 		$a_00_7 = {00 73 65 72 6e 61 6d 65 00 } 		$a_00_8 = {72 77 78 5f 62 79 65 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*5+(#a_00_1  & 1)*1+(#a_00_2  & 1)*1+(#a_00_3  & 1)*1+(#a_00_4  & 1)*1+(#a_00_5  & 1)*1+(#a_00_6  & 1)*1+(#a_00_7  & 1)*1+(#a_00_8  & 1)*1) >=10
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

af3a4202-49fd-4c5d-a6c2-3e7162bc3249

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion