Backdoor_Win32_Teevsock_A

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Backdoor:Win32/Teevsock.A,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 02 00 03 00 00

rule Backdoor_Win32_Teevsock_A{
	meta:
		description = "Backdoor:Win32/Teevsock.A,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 02 00 03 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_03_0 = {0f be 08 8b 55 ?? 03 55 ?? 33 ca 8b 45 ?? 03 45 ?? 88 08 83 7d ?? 03 7e } 		$a_03_1 = {68 e3 07 72 41 68 5d 52 2a 90 90 ff 15 ?? ?? ?? ?? ff 15 ?? ?? ?? ?? 89 45 fc 83 7d fc 57 } 		$a_00_2 = {73 71 6c 77 69 64 2e 64 6c 6c 00 00 73 76 63 68 6f 73 74 2e 65 78 65 00 73 71 6c 73 72 76 2e 65 78 65 00 } 	condition:
		((#a_03_0  & 1)*1+(#a_03_1  & 1)*1+(#a_00_2  & 1)*1) >=2
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

d25cc863-9ba2-4077-a7d7-2b666bf7c3c3

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion