Backdoor_Win32_CarpeDiem_3

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Backdoor:Win32/CarpeDiem,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR,04 00 04 00 04 00 00

rule Backdoor_Win32_CarpeDiem_3{
	meta:
		description = "Backdoor:Win32/CarpeDiem,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR,04 00 04 00 04 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {69 70 77 61 74 63 68 77 69 6e 73 68 6f 65 6e 6f 6c 6f 67 } 		$a_01_1 = {53 6f 66 74 57 61 72 65 5c 43 61 72 70 65 44 69 65 6d 56 61 72 73 5c 4b 69 74 5c } 		$a_01_2 = {64 69 61 6c 75 70 2e 63 61 72 70 65 64 69 65 6d 2e } 		$a_01_3 = {70 65 72 6c 2f 63 6f 75 6e 74 64 69 61 6c 75 70 69 6e 74 65 72 2e 70 6c 3f 6e 61 6d 65 3d } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1+(#a_01_3  & 1)*1) >=4
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

34f7842f-e05c-4c29-a301-1e80d6d3a3d4

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion