Backdoor_Win32_Plugx_N_dha

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Backdoor:Win32/Plugx.N!dha,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 04 00 00

rule Backdoor_Win32_Plugx_N_dha{
	meta:
		description = "Backdoor:Win32/Plugx.N!dha,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 04 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_00_0 = {31 c0 8a 04 13 32 01 83 f8 00 75 0e 83 fa 00 74 04 49 4a } 		$a_00_1 = {72 75 6e 64 6c 6c 33 32 20 22 25 73 22 20 41 63 74 69 76 65 51 76 61 77 20 22 25 73 22 } 		$a_00_2 = {72 75 6e 64 6c 6c 33 32 20 22 25 73 22 20 50 6c 61 79 20 22 25 73 22 } 		$a_01_3 = {53 65 6c 66 20 50 72 6f 63 65 73 73 20 49 64 3a 25 64 } 	condition:
		((#a_00_0  & 1)*1+(#a_00_1  & 1)*1+(#a_00_2  & 1)*1+(#a_01_3  & 1)*1) >=3
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

39d8081d-c01b-46ac-8434-0b6b01691b04

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion