Backdoor_Linux_Mirai_BQ_xp

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Backdoor:Linux/Mirai.BQ!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,05 00 05 00 06 00 00

rule Backdoor_Linux_Mirai_BQ_xp{
	meta:
		description = "Backdoor:Linux/Mirai.BQ!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,05 00 05 00 06 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {52 4f 43 52 59 53 59 52 43 } 		$a_01_1 = {6e 70 78 78 6f 75 64 69 66 66 65 65 67 67 61 61 63 73 63 73 } 		$a_01_2 = {68 6c 4c 6a 7a 74 71 5a } 		$a_01_3 = {6b 6b 76 65 74 74 67 61 61 61 73 65 63 6e 6e 61 61 61 61 } 		$a_01_4 = {31 30 37 2e 31 37 34 2e 32 34 31 2e 32 30 39 } 		$a_01_5 = {68 6b 6a 6d 6c 6f 6e 61 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*2+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1+(#a_01_3  & 1)*1+(#a_01_4  & 1)*1+(#a_01_5  & 1)*1) >=5
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

1afc3260-9bb2-497f-ad4e-9b7bb5de980d

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion