Backdoor_Linux_Mirai_AE_xp

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Backdoor:Linux/Mirai.AE!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 06 00 00

rule Backdoor_Linux_Mirai_AE_xp{
	meta:
		description = "Backdoor:Linux/Mirai.AE!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 06 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_00_0 = {50 52 4f 54 5f 45 58 45 43 } 		$a_00_1 = {2f 70 72 6f 63 2f 73 65 6c 66 2f 65 78 65 37 } 		$a_00_2 = {2f 70 72 6f 63 2f 73 65 6d 6e } 		$a_00_3 = {61 6e 74 69 68 6f 6e 65 79 } 		$a_00_4 = {63 68 6d 6f 6e 37 } 		$a_00_5 = {6d 64 65 62 75 6e 67 2e 48 69 33 32 } 	condition:
		((#a_00_0  & 1)*1+(#a_00_1  & 1)*1+(#a_00_2  & 1)*1+(#a_00_3  & 1)*1+(#a_00_4  & 1)*1+(#a_00_5  & 1)*1) >=4
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

dbd42d54-2b42-4447-8844-1060566ea35b

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion