Backdoor_Linux_Gafgyt_CA_xp

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Backdoor:Linux/Gafgyt.CA!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,05 00 05 00 05 00 00

rule Backdoor_Linux_Gafgyt_CA_xp{
	meta:
		description = "Backdoor:Linux/Gafgyt.CA!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,05 00 05 00 05 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {24 55 49 43 49 44 45 42 4f 59 24 } 		$a_01_1 = {6b 69 6c 6c 65 64 20 70 69 64 } 		$a_01_2 = {68 6c 4c 6a 7a 74 71 5a } 		$a_01_3 = {6e 70 78 58 6f 75 64 69 66 46 65 45 67 47 61 41 43 53 63 73 } 		$a_01_4 = {6d 48 6f 49 4a 50 71 47 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 4c } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1+(#a_01_3  & 1)*1+(#a_01_4  & 1)*1) >=5
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

603dc8ef-e2ad-421b-8056-43f63883369f

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion