Backdoor_Linux_Adore_A_xp

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Backdoor:Linux/Adore.A!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 05 00 00

rule Backdoor_Linux_Adore_A_xp{
	meta:
		description = "Backdoor:Linux/Adore.A!xp,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 05 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {61 64 6f 72 65 5f 68 69 64 65 66 69 6c 65 } 		$a_01_1 = {61 64 6f 72 65 5f 6d 61 6b 65 72 6f 6f 74 } 		$a_01_2 = {4e 6f 20 6c 75 63 6b 2c 20 6e 6f 20 61 64 6f 72 65 } 		$a_01_3 = {2f 70 72 6f 63 2f 68 69 64 65 2d 25 64 } 		$a_01_4 = {61 64 6f 72 65 5f 68 69 64 65 70 72 6f 63 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1+(#a_01_3  & 1)*1+(#a_01_4  & 1)*1) >=4
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

a4e7c96d-3915-4713-a741-463f4f8c222e

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion