Ransom_MSIL_CryptoLocker_DG_MTB

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Ransom:MSIL/CryptoLocker.DG!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 04 00 00

rule Ransom_MSIL_CryptoLocker_DG_MTB{
	meta:
		description = "Ransom:MSIL/CryptoLocker.DG!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 04 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_81_0 = {59 4f 55 52 20 46 49 4c 45 53 20 48 41 56 45 20 42 45 45 4e 20 45 4e 43 52 59 50 54 45 44 } 		$a_81_1 = {53 74 61 72 74 45 6e 63 72 79 70 74 69 6f 6e 50 72 6f 63 65 73 73 } 		$a_81_2 = {4e 61 6d 61 73 74 65 55 6e 6c 6f 63 6b } 		$a_81_3 = {46 69 6c 65 45 6e 63 72 79 70 74 } 	condition:
		((#a_81_0  & 1)*1+(#a_81_1  & 1)*1+(#a_81_2  & 1)*1+(#a_81_3  & 1)*1) >=4
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

d0934b2f-80de-4dc4-8d04-656a3173204d

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion