Ransom_MSIL_CryptoLocker_DH_MTB

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Ransom:MSIL/CryptoLocker.DH!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,37 00 37 00 06 00 00

rule Ransom_MSIL_CryptoLocker_DH_MTB{
	meta:
		description = "Ransom:MSIL/CryptoLocker.DH!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,37 00 37 00 06 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_81_0 = {50 6f 76 6c 73 6f 6d 77 61 72 65 } 		$a_81_1 = {52 61 73 6f 6d 77 61 72 65 32 2e 5f 30 } 		$a_81_2 = {54 6f 42 61 73 65 36 34 53 74 72 69 6e 67 } 		$a_81_3 = {5f 45 6e 63 72 79 70 74 65 64 24 } 		$a_81_4 = {50 61 79 4d 33 } 		$a_81_5 = {55 6d 46 7a 62 32 31 33 59 58 4a 6c 4d 69 34 77 4a 41 3d 3d } 	condition:
		((#a_81_0  & 1)*40+(#a_81_1  & 1)*40+(#a_81_2  & 1)*10+(#a_81_3  & 1)*10+(#a_81_4  & 1)*5+(#a_81_5  & 1)*5) >=55
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

862ba540-98f4-4b6a-a435-326363b7dabf

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion