Ransom_Win32_Ocelocker_PAA_MTB

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Ransom:Win32/Ocelocker.PAA!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 04 00 00

rule Ransom_Win32_Ocelocker_PAA_MTB{
	meta:
		description = "Ransom:Win32/Ocelocker.PAA!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 04 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {72 61 6e 73 6f 6d 77 61 72 65 } 		$a_01_1 = {4f 63 65 6c 6f 63 6b 65 72 2e 70 64 62 } 		$a_01_2 = {57 72 69 74 69 6e 67 20 72 61 6e 73 6f 6d 20 6e 6f 74 65 } 		$a_01_3 = {41 6c 6c 20 6f 66 20 79 6f 75 72 20 66 69 6c 65 73 20 61 72 65 20 65 6e 63 72 79 70 74 65 64 21 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1+(#a_01_3  & 1)*1) >=4
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

7f2db85b-912b-4deb-928c-ffb0987d4e3d

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion