Ransom_AndroidOS_SimpLock_C

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Ransom:AndroidOS/SimpLock.C,SIGNATURE_TYPE_DEXHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 04 00 00

rule Ransom_AndroidOS_SimpLock_C{
	meta:
		description = "Ransom:AndroidOS/SimpLock.C,SIGNATURE_TYPE_DEXHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 04 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {2f 2f 65 62 75 68 61 34 61 2e 6e 65 74 2f 6b 65 79 73 2f } 		$a_01_1 = {4c 61 6e 64 72 6f 69 64 2f 6f 73 2f 50 6f 77 65 72 4d 61 6e 61 67 65 72 24 57 61 6b 65 4c 6f 63 6b 3b } 		$a_01_2 = {67 65 6e 6b 65 79 } 		$a_01_3 = {57 61 6b 65 66 75 6c 42 72 6f 61 64 63 61 73 74 52 65 63 65 69 76 65 72 2e 6a 61 76 61 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1+(#a_01_3  & 1)*1) >=4
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

3b03f31d-ea67-4f05-8d28-ae7ca58b9293

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion