Ransom_Linux_Rango_A_MTB

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Ransom:Linux/Rango.A!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 05 00 00

rule Ransom_Linux_Rango_A_MTB{
	meta:
		description = "Ransom:Linux/Rango.A!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_ELFHSTR_EXT,04 00 04 00 05 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {6d 61 69 6e 2e 45 6e 63 72 79 70 74 } 		$a_01_1 = {4c 75 61 6e 53 69 6c 76 65 69 72 61 53 6f 75 7a 61 2f 72 61 6e 67 6f 77 61 72 65 2f 65 78 70 6c 6f 72 65 72 2e 4d 61 70 46 69 6c 65 73 } 		$a_01_2 = {2f 72 61 6e 67 6f 77 61 72 65 2f 6b 65 79 67 65 6e 2e 47 65 6e 65 72 61 74 65 4b 65 79 } 		$a_01_3 = {66 69 6c 65 70 61 74 68 2e 57 61 6c 6b } 		$a_01_4 = {64 69 72 74 79 4c 6f 63 6b 65 64 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1+(#a_01_3  & 1)*1+(#a_01_4  & 1)*1) >=4
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

da06411d-85f6-444e-85bd-710abd67c527

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion