HackTool_BAT_SMBExec_SK_MTB

YARA detection rule by roadwy

HackTool:BAT/SMBExec.SK!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 03 00 00

rule HackTool_BAT_SMBExec_SK_MTB{
	meta:
		description = "HackTool:BAT/SMBExec.SK!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 03 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {24 33 34 34 65 65 35 35 61 2d 34 65 33 32 2d 34 36 66 32 2d 61 30 30 33 2d 36 39 61 64 35 32 62 35 35 39 34 35 } 		$a_01_1 = {53 68 61 72 70 49 6e 76 6f 6b 65 2d 53 4d 42 45 78 65 63 5c 6f 62 6a 5c 52 65 6c 65 61 73 65 5c 53 4d 42 42 42 42 2e 70 64 62 } 		$a_01_2 = {53 4d 42 42 42 42 2e 65 78 65 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1) >=3
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

ee877722-0847-4e1e-8709-ecaf7a7dc649

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion