HackTool_Win32_DefenderRmv_A

YARA detection rule by roadwy

HackTool:Win32/DefenderRmv.A,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 03 00 00

rule HackTool_Win32_DefenderRmv_A{
	meta:
		description = "HackTool:Win32/DefenderRmv.A,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 03 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_80_0 = {44 65 66 65 6e 64 65 72 20 52 65 6d 6f 76 65 72 } 		$a_80_1 = {52 75 6e 50 72 6f 67 72 61 6d 3d 22 72 75 6e 2e 62 61 74 22 } 		$a_00_2 = {3b 63 6f 70 79 20 2f 62 20 63 6f 6d 70 69 6c 65 72 2e 6d 70 6d 20 2b 20 63 6f 6e 66 69 67 2e 74 78 74 20 2b 20 72 65 62 64 2e 37 7a 20 67 61 6c 6c 65 72 79 5f 6d 70 6d 2e 65 78 65 3b } 	condition:
		((#a_80_0  & 1)*1+(#a_80_1  & 1)*1+(#a_00_2  & 1)*1) >=3
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

8f846ba2-cfcc-4278-9aef-0a4633444d30

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion