HackTool_Win32_UACBypass_LKV_MTB

YARA detection rule by roadwy

HackTool:Win32/UACBypass.LKV!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 03 00 00

rule HackTool_Win32_UACBypass_LKV_MTB{
	meta:
		description = "HackTool:Win32/UACBypass.LKV!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 03 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {69 73 63 73 69 63 70 6c 5f 62 79 70 61 73 73 55 41 43 2d 6d 61 69 6e 5c 44 65 62 75 67 5c 69 73 63 73 69 65 78 65 2e 70 64 62 } 		$a_01_1 = {69 73 63 73 69 65 78 65 5f 6f 72 67 2e 53 65 72 76 69 63 65 4d 61 69 6e } 		$a_01_2 = {69 73 63 73 69 65 78 65 5f 6f 72 67 2e 44 69 73 63 70 45 73 74 61 62 6c 69 73 68 53 65 72 76 69 63 65 4c 69 6e 6b 61 67 65 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1) >=3
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

fa9559fb-b21b-4133-b064-1aa69c108ecc

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion