HackTool_Win32_Cachedump_dha

YARA detection rule by roadwy

HackTool:Win32/Cachedump!dha,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,64 00 64 00 04 00 00

rule HackTool_Win32_Cachedump_dha{
	meta:
		description = "HackTool:Win32/Cachedump!dha,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,64 00 64 00 04 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {5c 5c 2e 5c 70 69 70 65 5c 63 61 63 68 65 64 75 6d 70 70 69 70 65 } 		$a_00_1 = {53 45 43 55 52 49 54 59 5c 50 6f 6c 69 63 79 5c 53 65 63 72 65 74 73 5c 4e 4c 24 4b 4d 5c 43 75 72 72 56 61 6c } 		$a_01_2 = {47 65 74 50 72 6f 63 41 64 64 72 65 73 73 20 53 79 73 74 65 6d 46 75 6e 63 74 69 6f 6e 30 30 35 } 		$a_00_3 = {4c 53 41 20 43 69 70 68 65 72 20 4b 65 79 20 62 79 20 52 65 67 4f 70 65 6e 4b 65 79 45 78 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_00_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1+(#a_00_3  & 1)*1) >=100
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

5ee4e800-7c61-4183-ac6b-83af1c72bf63

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion