HackTool_Win64_XBack_A

YARA detection rule by roadwy

HackTool:Win64/XBack.A,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR,02 00 02 00 02 00 00

rule HackTool_Win64_XBack_A{
	meta:
		description = "HackTool:Win64/XBack.A,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR,02 00 02 00 02 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {65 78 65 20 3c 61 64 64 72 3a 70 6f 72 74 3e 20 3c 42 6f 74 49 64 5f 33 32 63 68 61 72 73 3e 20 3c 74 61 67 3d 73 63 68 65 6d 65 3a 2f 2f 64 65 73 74 3e } 		$a_01_1 = {43 61 6e 27 74 20 70 61 72 73 65 20 3c 72 6f 75 74 65 72 5f 69 70 3a 70 6f 72 74 3e 0a 00 00 00 43 61 6e 27 74 20 70 61 72 73 65 20 65 6e 64 70 6f 69 6e 74 20 2d 20 27 25 73 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1) >=2
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

8eebd5c0-95f4-4b92-8c88-b2ed0b27f942

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion