VirTool_Win32_Dupinject_A

YARA detection rule by roadwy

VirTool:Win32/Dupinject.A,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 03 00 00

rule VirTool_Win32_Dupinject_A{
	meta:
		description = "VirTool:Win32/Dupinject.A,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 03 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {74 61 73 6b 6b 69 6c 6c 20 2f 69 6d 20 65 78 70 6c 6f 72 65 72 2e 65 78 65 20 2f 66 } 		$a_01_1 = {43 4c 53 49 44 5c 7b 33 35 43 45 43 38 41 33 2d 32 42 45 36 2d 31 31 44 32 2d 38 37 37 33 2d 39 32 45 32 32 30 35 32 34 31 35 33 7d 5c 49 6e 50 72 6f 63 53 65 72 76 65 72 33 32 } 		$a_03_2 = {6a 00 6a 20 6a 01 6a 00 6a 03 68 00 00 00 c0 ff 35 ?? ?? ?? ?? ff 15 ?? ?? ?? ?? 85 c0 74 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_03_2  & 1)*1) >=3
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

7f22dbcf-1a60-4f53-be26-7ceab7fff279

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion