Trojan_Win32_CoinMiner_OF_bit_2

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Trojan:Win32/CoinMiner.OF!bit,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 04 00 00

rule Trojan_Win32_CoinMiner_OF_bit_2{
	meta:
		description = "Trojan:Win32/CoinMiner.OF!bit,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,03 00 03 00 04 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {73 63 68 74 61 73 6b 73 20 2f 63 72 65 61 74 65 20 2f 74 6e 20 5c 53 79 73 74 61 73 6b 73 5c 53 65 72 76 69 63 65 52 75 6e 20 2f 74 72 20 22 43 3a 5c 50 72 6f 67 72 61 6d 44 61 74 61 5c } 		$a_01_1 = {74 61 73 6b 6b 69 6c 6c 20 2f 66 20 2f 69 6d 20 61 74 74 72 69 62 2e 65 78 65 } 		$a_01_2 = {61 74 74 72 69 62 20 2b 73 20 2b 68 20 25 75 73 65 72 70 72 6f 66 69 6c 65 25 5c 41 70 70 44 61 74 61 5c 52 6f 61 6d 69 6e 67 } 		$a_01_3 = {54 61 73 6b 6d 67 72 2e 65 78 65 00 74 61 73 6b 6d 67 72 2e 65 78 65 00 50 72 6f 63 65 73 73 48 61 63 6b 65 72 2e 65 78 65 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1+(#a_01_3  & 1)*1) >=3
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

d403f089-662c-4ce3-818e-18ecc6ab3192

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion