Trojan_Win32_CoinMiner_DD

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Trojan:Win32/CoinMiner.DD,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,05 00 05 00 06 00 00

rule Trojan_Win32_CoinMiner_DD{
	meta:
		description = "Trojan:Win32/CoinMiner.DD,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,05 00 05 00 06 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_01_0 = {22 63 75 72 72 65 6e 63 79 22 20 3a 20 22 6d 30 6e 33 72 30 37 22 2c } 		$a_01_1 = {70 72 6f 63 65 73 73 20 68 61 63 6b 65 72 } 		$a_01_2 = {41 6e 76 69 72 20 54 61 73 6b 20 4d 61 6e 61 67 65 72 20 46 72 65 65 } 		$a_01_3 = {41 6e 76 69 72 20 54 61 73 6b 20 4d 61 6e 61 67 65 72 } 		$a_01_4 = {41 75 73 6c 6f 67 69 63 73 20 54 61 73 6b 20 4d 61 6e 61 67 65 72 } 		$a_01_5 = {46 3a 5c 63 61 6c 63 75 6c 61 74 6f 72 5c 48 61 73 68 65 72 5c 68 61 73 68 65 72 2d 6e 67 5c 62 69 6e 5c 57 69 6e 33 32 5c 52 65 6c 65 61 73 65 5c 64 73 73 65 63 2e 70 64 62 } 	condition:
		((#a_01_0  & 1)*1+(#a_01_1  & 1)*1+(#a_01_2  & 1)*1+(#a_01_3  & 1)*1+(#a_01_4  & 1)*1+(#a_01_5  & 1)*1) >=5
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

6899c362-b9bd-47c1-8f80-a552eb4a9dce

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion