Trojan_Win64_Rozena_CAFW_MTB

YARA detection rule by roadwy

Trojan:Win64/Rozena.CAFW!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,01 00 01 00 01 00 00

rule Trojan_Win64_Rozena_CAFW_MTB{
	meta:
		description = "Trojan:Win64/Rozena.CAFW!MTB,SIGNATURE_TYPE_PEHSTR_EXT,01 00 01 00 01 00 00 "
		
	strings :
		$a_03_0 = {41 b9 10 00 00 00 49 89 c8 48 89 c1 e8 ?? ?? ?? ?? 48 8b 85 e0 03 01 00 41 b9 40 00 00 00 41 b8 00 10 00 00 48 89 c2 b9 00 00 00 00 48 8b 05 75 6a 01 00 ff ?? 48 89 85 d8 03 01 00 48 8b 05 05 6a 01 00 ff ?? 48 89 c1 4c 8b 85 e0 03 01 00 48 8d 55 b0 48 8b 85 d8 03 01 00 48 c7 44 24 20 00 00 00 00 4d 89 c1 49 89 d0 48 89 c2 48 8b 05 4d 6a 01 00 ff } 	condition:
		((#a_03_0  & 1)*1) >=1
 
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

51c1bbce-f25b-4091-ab96-9b3a062a975a

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion