PseudoSigner_01_Borland_Delphi_50_KOLMCK_Anorganix

YARA detection rule by Yara-Rules · GPL-2.0

Rule PseudoSigner_01_Borland_Delphi_50_KOLMCK_Anorganix (No description metadata provided).

import "pe"
rule PseudoSigner_01_Borland_Delphi_50_KOLMCK_Anorganix: PEiD
{
    strings:
        $a = { 55 8B EC 90 90 90 90 68 ?? ?? ?? ?? 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 00 FF 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 00 01 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 EB 04 00 00 00 01 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 00 01 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 EB 08 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 EB 08 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 EB 08 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 EB 0E 00 90 90 90 90 90 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 EB 0A 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 00 00 00 01 E9 }
    condition:
        $a at pe.entry_point

}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

aa5fa2ef-bccc-4b1d-820b-cc9b7643ba96

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion